Thursday, July 29, 2010

Cetaphil Moisturizing Cream

THE BURDEN OF PROOF IN TAX LITIGATION PROCESS



In the process TAX LITIGATION been established almost as a dogma unchanged, that the burden of proof is on the party challenging the action dictated by the tax, whatever its content, also has said that this a priori distribution of the burden of proof does not become only the principle that WHO CLAIMED TEST, but a peculiar characteristic of the acts that are challenged in these processes, which are estimated according to the law until proven otherwise, what is ordinarily known as the legality of administrative actions tax content.

By means of modern Venezuelan doctrine, specializing in tax law allow me to draw some conclusions about these thoughts:

Administrative actions tax content certainly has the presumption LEGITIMACY that protect the rest of the acts of the public, but that does not mean always and in any case the Tax Administration is freed from the burden of proving the grounds for its expression of will, trial or knowledge, when such event has been contested in court.

The legitimacy of acts of tax imposed on the subject content nonconformist TO TAKE CHARGE administrative or judicial proceedings against the act, but this can not be interpreted as an automatic reversal of the burden of proof or as a relief from the burden of tax administration to test the foundations of the act, it would mean the effects of hypertrophy presumption to an area not having the same express their rules in the legal norms that regulate the distribution of the burden of proof at trial.

Certainly the law grants certain benefits or privileges to the Tax adjectives to facilitate the fulfillment of their duties of inspection, assessment and collection of taxes, especially given the lack of cooperation of the contributors to violate their formal duties by not providing or even intentionally hide information from which only they have and one of those benefits or privileges adjectives, perhaps the most outrageous, is the presumption of faith of the tax records.

However, this presumption of faith, never and can never be equated with public faith in itself a public document makes only a provisional value as evidence on the veracity of the facts described in the report.

Moreover, this assumption runs counter to the presumption of correctness accompanying the affidavits filed by taxpayers under Article 147 of the Tax Code and the principle of good faith that have relations between public administration and managed, mandated by Articles 141 of the constitution, 12 of the Organic Law on Public Administration and 9 of the Law on Administrative Procedure Simplification.

Given the above, we conclude that regardless of the presumption of legitimacy of the final acts issued by the tax authority and accuracy of tax assessments, are fully applicable to the general principles on the distribution the burden of proof under Articles 1354 of the Civil Code and 506 of the Code of Civil Procedure. UNTIL NEXT FRIDAY (...)

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Mucus Plug Description

my rock'n'roll

polemic

In late 1994, La Renga Works showered with a single disc in tow, and then edit the show in a album was called "Dancing on one leg." There appeared the songs that had been part of the home "Avoiding Puddles" and one of them was "Blues de Bolivia" theme that, according to its author Gustavo Napoli (Chizzo) was inspired by the ordeal of the protagonist of the film Midnight Express.




The song began to spread, and became in 1996 the Bolivian ears thanks to Channel 7 in La Paz (TELEFE raising a note that was beginning to give the song thread) leading to a rejection by the neighboring country to understand that the letter to his nation wronged. The Embassy of Bolivia that the issue got to stop spread and demanded an apology and corrections from the band, which circulated in various media as done, but its members always denied such correction.

* Supplement No. Page 12 (02/12/1999), signed by Pablo Roque Potkin and Casciero: "... the Bolivian ambassador did not understand these things and was upset about the direct relationship between your country and drugs (which va'cer, old ...), then the trio Slaughterhouse publicly apologized and explained that he was inspired by the movie Midnight Express. "
* IF Clarín Supplement (April 1996) signed by Fernando Garcia, was entitled "A gaffe as volanta "La Renga apologized to the Bolivian government for the lyrics of a song."
retile * Magazine Interview Magazine (USA, 1997), signed by Edith Bican (in the words of the members of La Renga) "In Bolivia were offended, but the truth is that we will never apologize to the embassy, \u200b\u200bas he said simply insist that they did not understand the point were they, and we would play the song ... ". Many

news and newspapers were in charge of expanding the loading issue against the band (especially TELEFE and Midi program with Mauro), and noted that the song had been COMFER censored by the emphasis on certain parts of the letter as "Cocaine, cocaine, I'm going to Bolivia" and "Cocaine, cocaine, I run the police / cocaine, marijuana, and tourists going to jail / Cocaine, cocaine , it's left up / cocaine, marijuana, set fire and not burn anything. "

The secrecy has always had the band with the press obviously deepened, and a particular interview, conducted months before conflict breaks out with the song, it was like the kick for the relationship appears to be no turning back. The same data on Friday, 30 October 1995 Yes by the supplement of Clarín newspaper, entitled "The kids make you want to star but not" (PHOTO). There, while prowling chat between rock questions about the neighborhood, self-management and marginalization, two points stand out: the first carried the Blues lyric of Bolivia and its censorship, and the second was entitled " The Round vs. La Renga. Small / Large differences "as confronting the two groups.

In December of that year, in an interview for the magazine Chaucha and Palito, the band members talked about the note in Clarín:
"What do you think the story of "If Clarin?
Tete: is crap because they put things that we said and put bullshit.
Chizzo: Layers and chabón bullshit we had put them. That we have to be chanting the phone number was a comment that was made like that (at Tete).
Chiflo: The chabón put all the nonsense that he wanted to.
Tete: I think it was a malicious report.
Manu: A frustrated the chabón psychologist.
Chiflo: The chabón knew the meaning of the lyrics and themes.
Chizzo: What will know! Do not know a note.
Chiflo: The Wave gets chabón he wants because he was not interested in the group.
Tank: The chabón is a moron.
Tete and Tank: The SI are all morons.
Chizzo: They, sex, vice and Rock & Roll, we are re tasted that bad, that we misbehave, we take drugs all the time.
(...)
Chizzo: They La Renga vs rounds, are creating a rivalry, because who reads it says uh! Look, these are against it, there is created a rivalry.
Tank: The band chabón ask us is what we like and we all said the Round. "
Among
notes apparently distorted and television appearances and newspaper headlines Argentina and Bolivia, the result was a clear resentment by of the band to the media. Thus, in the album "Broken by a thousand places" (successor of "Dancing on one leg") of the same year 1996, looms like a song seem to respond to certain words that circulated over the commotion throughout Bolivia Blues:
A load
my rock'n'roll

A load my rock and roll, exceeds any sea
containing the large glass straw in your queue.
if my snapdragons
lights the fuse and do not like to say a single truth
going to use your press to crush me,
and the song of life to banish you.

going to be wasting time, because back
our wind comes
that destroys everything it touches,
because my singing and have other mouths
and nobody can shut.

A load my rock and roll, exceeds any sea
containing the large glass straw in your queue.
fire if my tongue does not have a
hair and do not like to tell you the reality
going to aim your cannon to mind the song
and destroy life.

going to be wasting time,
because the wind behind us comes
that destroys everything it touches,
because my singing and have other mouths
and nobody can shut.



Sources:
Blog LMDS La Renga
Magazine Chaucha and Palito

Clarín Diario Página 12
My brain

Monday, July 5, 2010

Pro And Con Of Convection Oven

Intruders in rock? Answers

After much time sleeping on the mattress of the Argentine rock wrapped in newspaper sheets, this blog has reawakened after a morning of Friday, youth supplement of the daily "people" the breakfast with an interview that caused a kind of deja vu is not very nice.

The cover story of Bugler Yes Supplement on Friday June 25, 2010, promised interviews with two former guitarists Street, and the title of that one of them, Elio Delgado, says it all: "Callejeros no longer exists now Duck and his friends. " But the fabric is cut only when invited to the first question appears in the words of Delgado, the phrase "Callejeros is a cult" . And so the sentences full of anger and resentment are becoming almost non-stop spitting: "After Cromañón Daniel Cardell grabbed his head, which was the set designer, and remained as manager. This is the most garca of everyone there. Pato is the bloodsucker (Fontanet). Daniel and Juancho (Carbone, sax) have it as the goose that lays the golden eggs, they use a puppet. Those who are around are made of cardboard. That's the move. Rats are tremendous ". Also There are many contradictions and things that touch of indignation, in the words of a young man of 25 who as a teenager was one of the protagonists of the greatest tragedy in the history of Argentine rock: (talking about Street) "After Cromañón, the chabon change much. They have a great folly, a lot of paranoia in the band and a lot of major psychological illness. They re crazy, filed down the head (...) They will profit far as they can, sooner or later they will drop the mask ". But a few lines before said "I played by the salary: laburo as an employee. I never liked street. Musically they are horrible ".

As is known, is always very delicate enter into a discussion about what happened to Cro-Magnon, and at the same time, the blog is to delve into the dispute between musicians, it is not "Intruders in the rock and there Rial any worshiper at least around here. memory still works and recoiled very little while, precisely at 30 April this year, to remember an interview with another former guitarist for a band name, more precisely Tavo Kupinski of Lice. The note, like the other, coincidence? was signed by the same journalist Nicholas Igarzabal . That note was entitled "Towards while we were no longer a band, " gave a lot to talk about the harsh statements now a member of the balls against Ciro, bassist Micky and the band manager. The two notes

focus in identical situations (ex who rant against the "leaders" of groups that took part, while promoting their new projects) and are addressed in a similar position by the interviewer at the start, touching the subject of the previous round of another member (the drummer Vázquez Fernández Street and guitarist in Los Piojos), and the search for an answer that shoot at the decision makers. Sharp, the two titles (which are the face visible marks) offer almost traced phrases regarding the situation of the bands: "Street no longer exists, it is now Duck and Friends one hand, and " Pretty soon, they were no longer a band " by the lousy hand.

is logical stance of wanting a trade journal after interviewing make the fur fly, but sometimes you can get out of hand when taking the dirty laundry in the sun and burn so end on fire. Delgado's replies to readers place him in a too contradictory and lack of commitment to the serious situation experienced while on the side of Kupinski, although not leave bad stood, they set up a typical tenement television programs in the afternoon with blonde mushy and pathetic characters who just want a little fame. But there seems to be that the pursuit of rock, or at least not so obvious.

hope that in future no response arrives Ciro Martínez, or new notes as "the confessions of the two former members of The Like" or "the real reason why The Cadillacs did not return two of its members ". If so, we would be witnessing a new form of selling in the mainstream of Argentine rock, joining other at all pleasant (places that charge fortunes for musicians to touch, collect or swapped media interviews, megafestival friends, etc.) that appear as part of everyday life. There was always strong and tough statements crosses between musicians, but two notes traced almost identical purposes in such a short time ago we put a little paranoid about this issue.

journalist himself for his part, ironically created a post on his blog referred to the second of the notes, which caused a good discussion in the comments, two conflicting views put forward in the letter, where the race Sciences Communication from the UBA was the star to include many of the intellectuals as part of his bibliography.